At Univision’s town-hall-style event Wednesday, 33-year-old Jes ús Gonz ález requested Republican governmental candidate Donald Trump: “Could you explain your gun control policy to the parents of the victims of school shootings?”
Trump’s response to these mothers and dads: They’re a lot better off in a nation with much more weapons.
“We have a Second Amendment and right to bear arms, essentially,” Trump claimed. “And I’m very strongly an advocate of that — I think you need that. I think that if you ever tried to get rid of it, you wouldn’t be able to do it. You wouldn’t be able to take away the guns, because people need that for security. They need it for entertainment, and for sport and other things — but they also, in many cases, need it for protection.”
Trump echoed former National Rifle Association chief Wayne LaPierre’s famous argument that if much more “good people” have weapons, it aids keep prison exercise down.
“You want to have a lot of good people have [guns],” the earlier head of state claimed. “But if we didn’t have that, you would see a crime rate that’s crazy.”
Southern and Mountain West states with much more liberal weapon rules usually are inclined to have better fatality costs from weapon bodily violence than these of the Northeast or California, the place weapon limitations are tighter, according to research from the Center for Gun Violence Solutions atJohns Hopkins University
Trump didn’t state establishment capturings in his two-minute response, but he constantly charged his Democratic competitor, Vice President Kamala Harris, of wishing to take Americans’ weapons away.
“She wants to take everybody’s gun away, you know she’s always wanted that,” Trump claimed. “That’s because, uh, that’s what she wants. She wants to take everybody’s gun. You know who will never give their guns up? The bad guy. The bad guy’s not giving up the guns. So that’s what we have. We want safety, we want security, but you have to still adhere to the Second Amendment.”
Harris said at their only presidential debate final month that each she and her working good friend,Minnesota Gov Tim Walz, are weapon proprietors and don’t intend to take weapons removed from obedient weapon proprietors.
Both the Harris campaign and weapon radicals confiscated on Trump’s statements for specializing in weapon proprietors’ “entertainment” over the safety of schoolchildren.
“What a disgusting, soulless answer,” tweeted California Gov Gavin Newsom, a Harris ally.
Q: Could you focus on your weapon management plan to the mothers and dads of the targets of establishment capturings?
Donald Trump: You require weapons. You require them for amusement, for sporting actions, and numerous different factors.
What a revolting, feral response.pic.twitter.com/Vp54wL32Mo
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) October 17, 2024
“Yesterday, Former President Trump made clear again that he only cares about making his gun lobby friends rich, not the children being killed every single day in this country,” Vanessa Gonzalez, vice head of state of federal authorities and political occasions at Giffords Law Center, which concentrates on weapon bodily violence considerations, created in a declaration. “He has no plan, or even a concept of one, to stop this public health crisis.”
Trump, a earlier weapon proprietor, can no longer legally own firearms as a consequence of the truth that he has truly been based responsible of a felony.
