Udaipur Bulldozer Action Case: The Supreme Court heard a petition difficult the bulldozer motion taken within the well-known knife crime incident in Udaipur final month. There a faculty scholar had stabbed one other scholar of his personal class. There was an enormous uproar after this incident and the Udaipur administration demolished the home the place the accused scholar’s household lived on hire by working a bulldozer the subsequent day of the incident. The scholar injured on this assault on August 18 died 4 days later.
The home proprietor Rashid Khan had filed a petition within the Supreme Court towards the bulldozer motion on the home. In his petition within the Supreme Court, he alleged that the native authorities had demolished his home illegally. The listening to of this case was held beneath the listening to of the petition of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind. Rashid Khan had additionally made a number of calls for in his petition.
In this, a compensation of Rs 30 lakh was demanded from the state authorities. This quantity was demanded to be recovered from the officers who took motion. Along with this, a requirement was additionally made to register an FIR towards the officers accountable for demolishing the home.
The Rajasthan authorities on Saturday took an enormous motion within the Udaipur violence case and bulldozed the home of the tenth class scholar who dedicated the stabbing. This motion has been taken after the investigation of the Udaipur Development Authority, which revealed that the home of the accused scholar was constructed illegally on forest land… pic.twitter.com/HYwnTE7Ta4
— NDTV Rajasthan (@NDTV_Rajasthan) August 17, 2024
Proposal for tips concerning bulldozer motion
The petition additionally sought issuance of a nationwide guideline concerning bulldozer motion towards the accused in legal instances.
The Supreme Court allowed the listening to of the petition however refused to challenge any interim order on this case. However, the court docket questioned the bulldozer motion and requested whether or not an individual’s home will be demolished simply because it’s the home of an accused or a convict. The court docket proposed {that a} guideline ought to be made concerning the incidents of bulldozer motion. The subsequent listening to of the case might be on September 17.
Additional Advocate General Shiv Mangal Sharma argued on behalf of the Rajasthan authorities within the court docket, stating that this motion was authorized and it had nothing to do with the case of his tenant’s son. The authorities mentioned that he had constructed a home by occupying forest land and it was demolished solely after following correct process.
While listening to the case, the Supreme Court additionally recorded the aspect of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta of the Uttar Pradesh authorities.
Read this additionally -:
