Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has issued contempt notices to the then Chief UDH Secretary T Ravikant, Greater Municipal Corporation Commissioner Rukmani Riyad and Deputy Commissioner of Malviya Nagar Zone Arshdeep Brar for not resolving the objections regardless of the court docket order within the case associated to the possession of Batashe Walon Ki Bagichi close to Moti Dungri. A single bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas gave this order whereas listening to the preliminary contempt petition of Jaisingh Saini.
In the petition, advocate Vimal Chaudhary and advocate Yogesh Kumar Taylor advised the court docket that the petitioners have been residing in a spot referred to as Batashe Walon Ki Bagichi close to Moti Dungri for the reason that time of their ancestors. The then Maykhana Khas Jaipur Council had registered this 2.17 bigha land within the non secular class within the authorities information by taking a proposal on August 16, 1934. At the identical time, it was additionally thought-about non secular land within the metropolis survey performed on March 2, 1951. It was mentioned within the petition that earlier it was determined that the Batashe Walon Ki Committee would keep this non secular class land.
Read: Contempt discover issued to officers for not following court docket order – Rajasthan High Court
Despite this, this committee handed over the possession of the land to Shri Halwai Committee by taking a proposal on January 1, 1966. It was advised within the petition that the petitioner had utilized for the lease of this land within the Administration Cities Sang Abhiyan. On this, the company issued a basic discover and sought objections. During this, the Halwai Committee lodged an objection on November 2, 2021, however the company didn’t resolve its objection and didn’t even challenge a lease to the petitioner. A petition was filed within the High Court on this. The High Court, whereas disposing of the petition on February 23, requested the company to get rid of the purposes of the committee and the petitioner inside three months, however this order was additionally not adopted. On this, the petitioner filed a contempt petition.
