Jaipur: Rajasthan High Court has issued a contempt discover to Chief UDH Secretary T Ravikant and Greater Municipal Corporation Commissioner Rukmani Riad and others within the matter of removing of a Municipal Corporation worker from service regardless of the courtroom keep and has sought their reply. The single bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas gave this order whereas conducting the preliminary listening to on the contempt petition of Pradeep Kumar Sharma.
In the contempt petition, advocate Tarun Choudhary instructed the courtroom that the petitioner had labored as a helper cum retailer keeper within the electrical wing of the Municipal Corporation within the 12 months 1996. Since then he was working constantly on this put up. Meanwhile, he was faraway from service within the 12 months 2014. On this he had filed a petition within the High Court. During the listening to, on August 26, 2014, the one bench of the High Court stayed the removing of the petitioner and gave interim directions to make him work on the identical put up.
Read: Contempt discover to 3 together with two IAS officers for disobeying courtroom order – Rajasthan High Court
The company additionally introduced an utility to raise this ban, however the courtroom rejected this utility of the Municipal Corporation on August 26, 2017. It was mentioned within the petition that the Municipal Corporation stopped paying him his wage from the 12 months 2017 and on May 25, the Electricity Wing officer gave a verbal order and eliminated the petitioner from the put up. Challenging this, it was mentioned that the courtroom’s order of August 26, 2014 relating to the keep on removing of the petitioner from service is presently efficient and that petition has not been disposed of but. In such a scenario, it’s mistaken to take away him from service and cease his wage. It was requested within the petition that he ought to be given his excellent wage and brought again into service. Hearing this, the one bench has issued contempt discover to the involved officers and sought their reply.
