Jaipur: District Consumer Commission, Jaipur-III has imposed a joint high-quality of Rs 50,000 on Heritage Municipal Corporation, contractor and GM of Ganpati Plaza within the case associated to the mismanagement on the car parking zone. Commission Chairman Devendra Mohan Mathur and member Seema Sharma gave this order on the criticism of Deepak Verma. The Commission stated that there ought to be a board of the Municipal Corporation and the variety of the contractor on the car parking zone, however at most locations there may be neither a board, nor the variety of the contractor nor the interval of his contract. Due to this, the frequent shopper has to face issues at these locations.
It was stated within the criticism that on April 10, 2023, at 2:30 pm, he parked his two-wheeler exterior Ganpati Plaza and was sitting close to Gulab Chai Wala. When he reached his automobile quarter-hour later, an individual got here there and launched himself as a municipal company worker and charged him Rs 15 as parking charge. When the complainant went dwelling and checked, he came upon that this charge was for two hours. Challenging this within the Consumer Commission, he stated that the charge and period weren’t written in massive letters wherever on the parking place. The charge and the handle of his workplace have been additionally not talked about on the parking slip.
Read: A viewer’s shirt obtained torn after sitting on a damaged seat, cinema corridor fined Rs 22,000
In such a scenario, parking charge is being charged by illegally occupying the highway exterior Ganpati Plaza. The Municipal Corporation replied that they’ve given the contract of parking by e-auction for the interval from May 26, 2023 to May 25, 2024. Heritage Corporation will not be written wherever within the slip offered by the complainant. They haven’t any reference to this. After listening to the arguments of each side, the Commission stated that the slip has the signature of the contractor, however it’s surprising that Rs 15 has been charged from the complainant for quarter-hour. Doing that is an unfair commerce follow.
