Jaipur : There is a track in a movie that apne hello girate hain nasheman pe bijliyan.. Something comparable was seen within the mining division when the division officers imposed a tremendous of 10 crores on the licensee within the case of unlawful mining of limestone in Ramganj Mandi. But the extra director of the division overturned this determination and gave a call in favor of the licensee. Thankfully, the mining division determined to assessment this determination by itself initiative and the presiding officer and the joint joint secretary declared the choice of the extra director improper in the entire matter and now orders have been issued to take motion towards the licensee as per the foundations i.e. to recuperate the tremendous.
Actually the matter is said to mining lease quantity 68/2008 of Ramganj Mandi. Licensee Damanjot Singh illegally mined 70865 tonnes of limestone within the land Khasra quantity 1702 adjoining to the mining lease. In the whole matter, the workforce of the Mines Department, after inspection of the spot, set a requirement of 9 crore 92 lakh 31996. After this, the whole case received dragged within the guidelines and rules for 16 months. When the matter reached Additional Director Deepak Tanwar, he thought-about the unlawful mining and the demand made by the groups of his personal division as improper and issued orders to finish the whole case. From right here on, the senior officers of the division began smelling a rip-off and a call was taken to revise the whole case.
What occurred after this proves that the Additional Director was seen to be biased in favour of the licensee in the whole case as a result of the choice given by the Joint Secretary after revision not solely orders got to recuperate the tremendous from the licensee but additionally the collusion of the account holder with the licensee in the whole case, what motion was ordered towards him as properly, plainly the choice of Additional Director Deepak Tanwar was improper, now it must be seen what motion the Mines Department takes towards the Additional Director in the whole case. Even earlier than this, Deepak Tanwar has been accused of deceptive the federal government by giving improper details about the restoration of Rs 307 crore. Let us make you conscious of the story layer by layer of this complete recreation of Rs 10 crore.
– During investigation on fifth April final yr, unlawful mining of 70865 tonnes of mineral limestone was discovered within the adjoining khatedari land Khasra No. 1702, exterior the authorised space by the mining lease holder of mining lease quantity 68/2008, within the khatedari land from his authorised space.
– 21 April 2023 Demand of penalty and compound charge of Rs 9,92,31,996 was established towards the mining lease holder
– Against this, the lessee filed a writ within the High Court, Jaipur. The High Court put aside the order of demand and remanded the lessee to take motion after offering him ample alternative of being heard.
– On 21-06-2023, the spot inspection was accomplished within the presence of mining lease holder Damanjot Singh Anand and Halka Patwari. In the spot investigation, the scenario of unlawful mining was discovered as per the earlier spot panchnama dated 05-04-2023, that’s, it was confirmed that unlawful mining was accomplished by the mining lease holder Damanjot Singh Anand himself exterior the authorised mining lease space 68/2008.
– Demand of Rs 9.92 crore re-established towards the mining lessee by workplace order dated 29-08-2023
– TI filed an utility earlier than the court docket of Additional District and Session Judge, Ramganj Mandi towards the demand order
– While the matter was pending, one other case was filed towards the identical demand order earlier than the Court of Additional Director (Mines), Kota.
-Superintending Mining Engineer, Kota order dated 15-12-2023 Mining Lease No. 68/2008 was cancelled.
– Order dated 22-03-2024 was handed by the Additional District Judge Ramganj Mandi concerning the choice “The original suit should not decide the recovery of the amount mentioned in the notice regarding the recovery amount issued in compliance with the spot panchnama report dated 05-04-2023 and 21-06-2023 nor cancel the mining permit approved in favor of the applicant during this period.”
– On fifth April, the court docket transferred the matter to Additional Director Khan, Udaipur and directed to dispose it off.
– The Superintending Mining Engineer, Kota took possession of the mining lease space in Rajpaksh
– On deciding to attraction towards the order dated 22-3-2024 handed by the court docket of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramganj Mandi given by the federal government via letter dated 18-5-2024, S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2967/2024 dated 27-06-2024 was filed within the High Court, Jaipur via Additional State Counsel.
– The committee report dated 21-06-2023 by the order of Additional Director Mines, Udaipur dated 10-07-2024, the demand order dated 29-08-2023 issued by Mining Engineer, Rajganjmandi, the mining lease cancellation order dated 15-12-2023 handed by the Superintending Mining Engineer, Kota and the mining lease possession order dated 10-06-2024 by Mining Engineer, Ramganjmandi amounting to Rs 9,92,31,996 had been cancelled.
– Orders of revision given in Joint Secretary, Mines and Petroleum Department, Jaipur towards the order of Additional Director Mines, Udaipur dated 10-07-2024 from the order of the Directorate dated 31.7.2024
– Suo moto revision was accomplished on 5.8.2024 earlier than the Joint Secretary, Mines and Petroleum Department, Jaipur
– On September 24, the P Officer and the Joint Secretary thought-about the choice of the Additional Director improper and gave their determination.
According to the choice given by the Joint Secretary, the account holders of Khasra quantity 1702 additionally didn’t lodge any grievance concerning the unlawful mining accomplished on their account land, which clearly reveals that the account holders of Khasra quantity 1702 are additionally answerable for the stated unlawful mining. On being knowledgeable by the Patwari and the Mines Department, the Tehsildar ought to be certain that the motion of cancelling the account rights of the account holder is taken. The Tehsildar ought to take motion towards the responsible individuals by utilizing the powers given within the guidelines of the Mines Department for unlawful mining. “In the order of the stated round, the Mining Engineer, Ramganj Mandi is directed to take motion towards the account holders of Khasra quantity 1702 as per the foundations and inform the involved Tehsildar for vital motion inside 10 days of passing the order. It is evident from this that the position of the Additional Mining Director has been suspicious in the whole matter. Now it must be seen whether or not the Mines Department takes motion towards the Additional Director together with the motion towards the licensee or not?
